Tuesday, December 10, 2019

India’s Hofstede assignment sample paper

Question: Discuss about the Indias Hofstede. Answer: Introduction: Indias Hofstede The culture of the people is an important part of any society or nation. The study of Geert Hofstede is used widely to study different cultures and to compare the cultures of various nations. He defines culture as the collective programming of the mind distinguishing the members of one group or category of people from others (McLean Wang, 2015).The objective of this paper is to discuss the Hofstede model for India. The score of India on Hofstede dimensions can be shown as: Source: https://geert-hofstede.com/india.html The score of India for each of these dimensions can be discussed as: Power Distance: 77 This dimensions shows the difference between the people of society. The high score on this dimension reflects that people in the society are not equal. The score of 77 for India suggests the presence of various hierarchical levels in the society and a presence of top-down structure. Individualism: 48 This dimensions shows the traits of individualism in the country. India has an average score of 48 in this dimension. This suggests that Indian society is mix of individualism and collectivism. There are some people in the society that thinks that society is a mix of various classes and people should live life in a collective manner. Masculinity: 56 This dimension suggests the presence of competition in the society. The high score in this dimension reflects the high competition in the society where people are driven by achievement, competition and success. A low score in this dimension suggests that the people in the society have high quality and caring life. India scores 56on this dimension and is thus considered a Masculine society. Uncertainty Avoidance: 40 The dimension Uncertainty Avoidance has to do with the way that a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future or just let it happen. India scores 40 in this dimension and this shows that Indian people are patient and they accept the fact that future cannot be predicted. Long Term Orientation: 51 This dimension deals with the way society is linked with the past and how it impacts the future. India scores 51 on this dimension and this shows that India is a balanced society. The people in the India believe that future cannot be predicted and they believe in Karma. India has an average score and it shows that India does not think much about the future (Gill Sharma, 2012). Indulgence: 26 This dimension deals with the socialization level of children in the society. India scores only 26 on this dimension. This shows that Indian society is a restraint society where the emphasis is not given on leisure time or the attainment of personal desires. My Understanding of Hofsetde Findings I would discuss my experiences on the dimensions of Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance and Indulgence. My personal experience on these three dimensions can be discussed as: Power Distance: The high score of 77 for India suggests the presence of various hierarchical levels in the society and a presence of top-down structure. I have observed the same in my interaction with one of my friends (Chand, 2014). My Indian friend has various servants in his house and he told me the differences among the people at various level. My friend told me that power distance is reducing in India. However, the difference in the hierarchical level is felt as explained by my friend. Uncertainty Avoidance: India scores 40 in this dimension and this shows that Indian people are patient and they accept the fact that future cannot be predicted. My Indian friend told me that he lives the moment and he tries to improve his present life, as the future is uncertain. My friend told me that he does the short term planning and long term planning. However, the emphasis is given on short-term orientation and goals rather than long-term goals and objectives. He told me that he would have short term plans for future. Indulgence: India scores only 26 on this dimension. This shows that Indian society is a restraint society where the emphasis is not given on leisure time or the attainment of personal desires. I have felt the same in my friend. He always keeps himself busy with some work. He feels that life is well spent on the chores rather than free time. I can say that Indian people are very hard working people. I know my friend, who works at least 50 hours a week. He believes that people should work hard so that they can live a good life. Actually, the population is very high in India and likewise the competition in the country is high and opportunities are less. Therefore, Indian people do not have the luxury of leisure and free time. One Dimension Where Hofstede Results Surprised me One of the dimensions that surprised me is Indulgence. This dimension deals with the socialization level of children in the society. India scores only 26 on this dimension. This shows that Indian society is a restraint society where the emphasis is not given on leisure time or the attainment of personal desires (Caporarello Magni, 2016). However, there are various cases when I have realized that Indian likes leisure times. For example, one of my uncles is Indian and every year he would have vacation plan. He strongly believes that people should have vacation time so that they can enjoy with their friends and family. References Caporarello, L., Magni, M. and Pennarola, F., 2014, September. Does Culture Make the difference? Technology Acceptance and Diffusion in India. InMCIS(p. 15). Chand, M., 2014. Diaspora identity, acculturation policy and FDI: The Indian diaspora in Canada and the United States.Asian Business Management,13(4), pp.283-308. Gill, A., Sharma, S.P., Mathur, N. and Bhutani, S., 2012. The effects of job satisfaction and work experience on employee-desire for empowerment: A comparative study in Canada and India.International Journal of Management,29(1), p.190. Wang, J. and McLean, G.N., 2015. Promoting Diversity in India Where Do We Go From Here?.Advances in Developing Human Resources, p.1523422315614930.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.